1995 Final data deliveries (through 1992) to PDS SBN by DDS Science Team (E. Gruen, MPI Heidelberg) 01 Jan 1996 Creation of V1.0 (M. Sykes, SBN) 06 Mar 1996 PDS SBN Peer Review (Tucson, Arizona) 1998 Final data updates and new data deliveries (through 1995) to PDS SBN by DDS Science Team (H. Krueger, MPI Heidelberg) 31 Dec 1998 Upgrades and corrections for V2.0 (M. Sykes, SBN) 09 Mar 1999 PDS SBN Peer Review (Heidelberg, Germany) START_TIME = 1990-10-27T18:53 STOP_TIME = 1992-12-31T23:18Dataset Overview
This data set contains information on dust the dust environment in interplanetary space within the inner solar system, between Jupiter and the Sun, and at high polar latitudes of the Sun. Both interplanetary and interstellar dust particles have been detected. This information is collected with a dust impact experiment, from which may be inferred direction of motion, mass, velocity and charge (see ULYDINST.CAT). The data presented in this dataset include instrumental readouts, inferred metadata, calibration information and a calendar of events. Specifically:
1) ulyddust.tab - data received from the dust detector, the spacecraft, and physical properties derived from the detector data (Gruen et al., 1995a and Krueger et al., 1999a).
2) ulydevnt.tab - data received from the dust detector, the spacecraft, and physical properties derived from the detector data for reliable dust impacts plus noise events.
3) ulydcode.tab - value ranges corresponding to codes found in ulyddust.tab.
4) ulydcalb.tab - laboratory calibration data used to relate instrument responses to physical properties of the impacting dust particles.
5) ulydarea.tab - the area of the dust detector exposed to particles as a function of their velocity direction relative to the detector axis.
6) ulydstat.tab - time history of the Ulysses mission and dust detector configuration, tests and other events.
The data received from the spacecraft are used for determining the location and orientation of the spacecraft and instrument. Given are the SPACECRAFT-SUN DISTANCE, ECLIPTIC LONGITUDE, ECLIPTIC LATITUDE, SPACECRAFT-EARTH DISTANCE, SPACECRAFT-JUPITER DISTANCE, ROTATION ANGLE, DETECTOR ECLIPTIC LONGITUDE, and DETECTOR ECLIPTIC LATITUDE.
Data received from the dust detector are given in an integer code format. Some of the integer codes represent a range of values within which the data could fall (e.g., ION AMPLITUDE CODE), some may represent a specific value (e.g., ION COLLECTOR THRESHOLD), and others a classification based upon other integer codes (e.g., EVENT CLASS).
The instrument data consist of cataloging information, instrument status, instrument readings at time of impact, and classification information. The cataloging information includes the SEQUENCE NUMBER (impact number), DATE JULIAN (time of impact), and SECTOR (the pointing of the instrument at time of impact). The instrument status data are the threshold levels of the detectors and the CHANNELTRON VOLTAGE LEVEL.
The instrument readings include the amplitude codes of the detectors aboard the instrument and the integer codes representing the charge level rise times of the detectors, the difference in starting times of the ion signal and the electron signal, electron and ion signal coincidence, and ion and channeltron signal coincidence.
The classification information is used to assist in classifying an event into probable impact and non-impact categories. There are three variables used in classification: EVENT DEFINITION which records which detectors begin a measurement cycle; ION AMPLITUDE RANGE which is the classification of the ION AMPLITUDE CODE into 6 subranges (used with EVENT CLASS); and EVENT CLASS which categorizes events into a range of probable impacts to probable non-impacts.
The PARTICLE SPEED and PARTICLE MASS and their corresponding error factors are determined from the instrument and calibration data given in ulyddust.tab and ulydcalb.tab, respectively.
Calibration Data
ION RISE TIME, ELECTRON RISE TIME, ION CHARGE MASS RATIO, and ELECTRON
CHARGE MASS RATIO were measured for iron, glass, and carbon particles
of known mass and impacting at known speeds. Since the composition of
particles striking the Ulysses spacecraft is unknown, logarithmic
averages of the above values are used to infer the particle speed and
mass from the instrumental measurements. See Goller (1988).
The data were provided in a private communication to M. Sykes (Jun 29
03:04 MST 1995) by M. Baguhl. They are the results of these experiments
for impacts at an angle of 34 degrees from the detector axis.
Processing Level
The data contain different levels of processing. Some processing
was done at the time of the impact observation. This processing
categorized the detector responses to transmit the data efficiently
back to Earth. Data received on Earth is given as an integer code.
These integer codes can, for example, represent ranges of values, or
can be a classification determined from other integer codes. On Earth,
these integer codes were then fit to calibration curves to determine
the speed and mass of the impacting particle. See (Goller and Gruen 1989;
Gruen et al., 1995c).
This data set contains the information from the spacecraft instrument as
received on Earth, information about the location and pointing
direction of the spacecraft, and the meta-data determined from the data
analysis.
The calibration data are included as part of this dataset.
Sampling Parameters
The occurrence of an impact with the instrument begins a measurement
cycle. The on-board detectors measure a charge accumulation versus
time in order to measure the rise time of the accumulation and any
coincidences between detector readings. The on-board computer converts
these measurements to integer codes to minimize the amount of data
that is transferred back to Earth. After the conversion, the integer
codes are categorized to determine if an event is more likely to be an
impact or noise event. The data are then stored until it is time to
transmit to Earth.
Data Reduction - Impact Speed
Impact speed (V) is obtained from the rise-time measurements of the ion
and electron detectors (IT and ET, respectively) using procedures
described in part by Gruen et al. (1995c) and a private communication
to M. Sykes (Jul 22 03:43 MST 1995) from M. Baguhl. The calibration
tables used correspond to the mean values obtained for the three
different projectile materials with which the instruments were
calibrated (Goller and Gruen 1989; Gruen et al., 1995c). A rise-time
measurement is started when the respective signal exceeds its threshold
and is stopped by a flag pulse from the peak-detector. Impact
calibration was performed in the speed interval from about 2 km/s to
70 km/s, so impact speeds derived from rise-time measurements will be
limited to this range.
Dust accelerator tests as well as experience with flight data have shown
that (1) the shape of the ion signal is less susceptible to noise than
the shape of the electron signal and (2) for true impacts, ELECTRON
AMPLITUDE CODE values (EA) are generally greater than the ION AMPLITUDE
CODE values (IA) by 2 to 6. As a consequence, the electron rise-time is
only used for impact speed determination if 2 =< EA-IA =< 6. Since both
speed measurements, if available, are independent, one obtains two (often
different) values VIT and VET, respectively. The impact speed is then
taken to be the geometric mean of VIT and VET.
Determining VIT:
If EA=15, or EA>=60, or EA<5, then ET is not valid, and only VIT is used
to determine impact speed.
If IT is invalid and 6
Data Reduction - Impact Speed Error Factor
The upper and lower estimates of impactor speed are obtained by
multiplying and dividing, respectively, the mean particle speed by the
velocity error factor, VEF. If only one speed is measured, and is from
the electron detector, the minimum uncertainty is VEF=2. If only one
speed is measured, and is from the ion detector, the minimum uncertainty
is VEF=1.9. It is assumed that minimum error of 1.6 is achieved if both
individual speeds agree to within a factor of 4. This error corresponds
to the logarithmic mean of the minimum errors in the two cases when only
a single speed is valid.
Since these are all 1-sigma errors, it may happen that VIT or VET fall
outside the error bar given for the mean impact speed, V. In order to
avoid this, the error factor is 'stretched' to contain the values:
If the ratio of both speeds exceeds 4, then the uncertainty can increase
to about 10 in the calibrated speed range. In any case, a speed value
with an uncertainty factor VEF>6 should be ignored.
Data Reduction - Impactor Mass
Once a particle's impact speed (V) has been determined, the charge to
mass ratio can be determined from calibration measurements (Figure 3,
Gruen et al. (1995c); ulydcalb.tab). The charge to mass ratio for a given
impact speed (V) is determined by linear interpolation of the calibration
table (ulydcalb.tab) on a double logarithmic scale, yielding a separate
value for the ion grid measurement (QIM) and and electron grid measurement
(QEM).
From these values and the respective impact charges (QI and QE)
corresponding to IA and EA, respectively (Table 4, Gruen et al. (1995c);
ulydcalb.tab), mass values (MQI=QI/QIM and MQE=QE/QEM) are determined
corresponding to the ion and electron grid measurements. When both MQI
and MQE are valid, the impact particle mass, M, is the geometric
mean of these two values, or the value corresponding to the valid
measurement if the other is invalid. If there is no valid impact speed,
then there is no valid impactor mass.
Note: when V is invalid, M is invalid.
Note: when IA=0, QI is invalid and MQI is invalid.
Note: when EA=0, QE is invalid and MQE is invalid.
Data Reduction - Impactor Mass Error Factor
The upper and lower estimate of impactor speed is obtained by multiplying
and dividing, respectively, the mean particle speed by the mass error
factor, MEF. If the speed is well determined (VEF=1.6) then the mass value
can be determined with an uncertainty factor MEF=6. Larger speed
uncertainties can result in mass uncertainty factors greater than 100.
The mass error is calculated from the speed error, keeping in mind that
mass detection threshold is proportional to speed to the 3.5th power.
In addition, there is an error factor of 2 from the amplitude
determination. Added together (logarithmically) these yield
MEF=10**(sqrt((3.5*log(VEF))**2+(log(2.))**2))
(Private communication to M. Sykes from M. Baguhl, Mar 6 03:57 MST 1996.
This differs from the exponent of 3.4 given in Gruen et al. (1995a))
Coordinate System
The coordinates of the spacecraft are given in heliocentric ecliptic
latitude and longitude (equinox 1950.0), where the pointing direction
of the sensor is given in spacecraft centered ecliptic latitude and
longitude (equinox 1950.0).
Instrument Status
In a private communication to M. Sykes (23 Dec 12:59 MET 1998),
H. Krueger reported the following:
CONFIDENCE_LEVEL_NOTE
Impact times
The impact times are recorded with an accuracy of 2 seconds
(Gruen et al., 1995c), corresponding to a transmission rate above
256 bits per second. In a private communication to M. Sykes
(Nov 12 08:16 MST 1998), H. Krueger explained that 'for longer
readout intervals the accuracy is less because the dust instrument
clock gets reset between two readouts and the time information is
lost. For example with 128 bps the accuracy is 896sec, with 64 bps,
it is 1792 sec, and so on... . So far, a one minute accuracy was
sufficient for the Ulysses data.'
Sector
In a private communication to M. Sykes (Nov 17 02:25 MST 1998),
H. Krueger stated that when the ROTATION ANGLE is invalid, SECTOR
is also invalid. In the data that have been published in the literature
electronically, prior to 11/98, valid values of SEC are reported when
ROTATION ANGLE is invalid. This has been corrected. See Baguhl (1993) for
the relationship between ROTATION ANGLE and SECTOR.
In V1.0 of this data set, SECTOR was reported in degrees. In V2.0
Sector is reported as its original 8-bit word, and has a value between
0 and 255 (when valid). Conversion to degrees may be accomplished
through scaling by 1.40625.
Ion Channeltron Coincidence (ICC)
The designation ICC is used following Gruen et al. (1995c) and Krueger
et al. (1999b), noting that in Gruen et al. (1995a and b) and Krueger
et al. (1999a) the designation is IIC.
Entrance Grid Amplitude Code (PA)
In the data that have been published in the literature and electronically,
prior to 11/98, there are values of PA which exceed 47. In a private
communication to M. Sykes (Mar 6 03:57 MST 1996), Michael Baguhl
and Rainer Riemann stated:
As a consequence of subsequent uncertainty about the origin of PA values
greater than 47, in a private communication to M. Sykes (Nov 6 04:07
MST 1998), H. Krueger requested that PA values greater than 47 be
corrected to '99'. This has been done in releases of the DDS data through
the PDS after 11/98.
Electron Collector Threshold (ECP)
For ulydevnt.tab event #85327, ECP=2 while the nominal instrument setting
is ECP=1. In a private communication to M. Sykes (9 Dec 1998 13:27:41
MET), H. Krueger stated that this is probably due to a bit error since
the instrument setting was not changed.
Channeltron Voltage Level (HV)
The nominal high voltage HV=4 (1250V) could not be used because of
unexpected noise on the channeltron. It is assumed that the nearby
radioactive thermal generators (RTGs) are to blame, although other
causes cannot be excluded. During ground tests (without RTGs) no such
noise was observed. See Gruen et al. (1995a).
Impact speed
In a private communication to M. Sykes (Jul 22 03:43 MST 1995), M. Baguhl
stated that the reason for the exclusion of the values IA=49,18 and 0
EA=49,31 is empirical. These values are close to the switching points of
the amplifier ranges and therefore produce incorrect time measurements.
The adjustment of the times in amplifier range 2 was made in order to
prevent illegal time values.
----------------
----------------
-------------------
-----------------------------
If IA > 16 and IT > 12, then fix IT=14.
Else, if IA > 16 and IT =< 12, then add 2 to the corresponding
value of IT.
VIT is then found in Table 5b of Gruen et al. (1995c) or ulydcode.tab.
Note: If IT=0, then VIT is invalid. This differs from
Gruen et al. (1995c).
Determining VET:
If EA > 16 and ET > 12, then fix ET=14.
Else, if EA > 16 and ET =< 12, then add 2 to the corresponding
value of ET.
VET is then found in Table 5b of Gruen et al. (1995c) or ulydcode.tab.
Note: If ET=0, then VET is invalid. This differs from
Gruen et al. (1995c).
If IA=49, or IA>=60, or IA<3, then IT is not valid, and only VET is used
to determine impact speed.
------------------------------------------
If VIT > 4*VET, then
VEF=(VIT/VET-4.)/31.*(1.6*sqrt(35.)-1.6)+1.6
If VET > 4*VIT, then
VEF=(VET/VIT-4.)/31.*(1.6*sqrt(35.)-1.6)+1.6
(private communication to M. Sykes from M. Baguhl, Mar 6 03:57 MST
1996).
-----------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
-----------------
-----------------
GRU off GRU on GRU configuration complete
91-165 15:04 91-169 16:18 91-169 17:00
93-045 06:53 93-045 14:23 93-045 22:50
The information found in Tables 2 in Gruen et al. (1995a) and Table 1
in Krueger et al. (1999a) have been modified to correspond to the above.
------------
------
---------------------------------
---------------------------------
'Values of PA greater 47 are caused by a bit flip (caused by a
timing bug in the sensor electronics) of the MSB. For values
greater 47, a value of 16 has to be subtracted.'
This correction was made to all PDS DDS files created prior to 11/98.
----------------------------------
------------------------------
------------